Comparing Obama: Three Essential Readings
Are you one of many voters still undecided between Senators Clinton and Obama? Are you confused about their programs, policies and positions? Do you wonder whether there is any real difference between them? Then this post is for you.
The media say there’s not much difference between them. Clinton said she’s got way more experience than Obama. She also says that Obama is all hope and no substance, all speeches and no action.
But none of the millions of voters who know Obama, who have read his speeches, position papers and books, and who voted for him so far (including me) believe any of this. We think what Senator Clinton and the media are saying about him is—to use Obama’s brand of understatement—“inaccurate.”
Would you like to know why? All you have to do is read the following:
Reading these three things will take you less than an hour. It will open your eyes to the promise of Obama, not just in hope, but in penetrating thought, sound judgment, prudent and comprehensive policy, and strategic action.
You also might want to compare Clinton and Obama in character or leadership, or with a handy comparison chart. The results might surprise you.
You won’t find this information in anyone’s stump speeches or any debate. You won’t find it in the current mainstream media (although the first two items were published there some time ago.) If you want to understand what all the fuss is about, you must read and decide for yourself.
Will you devote an hour to getting informed on the most important election in forty years?
permalink
P.S. For those who want more, I’ve also posted a more extensive reading list. But you can get a good idea of how substantive, thoughtful, prudent and comprehensive Obama’s policies are just from reading the first two items linked above.
The media say there’s not much difference between them. Clinton said she’s got way more experience than Obama. She also says that Obama is all hope and no substance, all speeches and no action.
But none of the millions of voters who know Obama, who have read his speeches, position papers and books, and who voted for him so far (including me) believe any of this. We think what Senator Clinton and the media are saying about him is—to use Obama’s brand of understatement—“inaccurate.”
Would you like to know why? All you have to do is read the following:
- 1. Obama’s comprehensive plan to fight terrorism (scroll down and read the whole speech, not just the highlights at the beginning).
- 2. Obama’s comprehensive plan for health care (again, read the whole speech; the best part is toward the end).
- 3. My own assessment of his experience, with a table comparing him with Senator Clinton and Presidents Lincoln, Kennedy, Reagan, Carter, and George W. Bush.
Reading these three things will take you less than an hour. It will open your eyes to the promise of Obama, not just in hope, but in penetrating thought, sound judgment, prudent and comprehensive policy, and strategic action.
You also might want to compare Clinton and Obama in character or leadership, or with a handy comparison chart. The results might surprise you.
You won’t find this information in anyone’s stump speeches or any debate. You won’t find it in the current mainstream media (although the first two items were published there some time ago.) If you want to understand what all the fuss is about, you must read and decide for yourself.
Will you devote an hour to getting informed on the most important election in forty years?
permalink
P.S. For those who want more, I’ve also posted a more extensive reading list. But you can get a good idea of how substantive, thoughtful, prudent and comprehensive Obama’s policies are just from reading the first two items linked above.
posted by Jay Dratler, Jr., Ph.D., J.D. @ 2/21/2008 06:43:00 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home